Effects of a blended design of closed-book and open-book examinations on dental students' anxiety and performance
- PMID: 36635682
- DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04014-9
Effects of a blended design of closed-book and open-book examinations on dental students' anxiety and performance
Abstract
Background: While closed-book examinations (CBEs) have traditionally been implemented in dental education, open-book examinations (OBEs) are being introduced for the purpose of acquiring higher levels of knowledge and promoting long-term memory. This study examines whether it is effective to use a blended assessment of CBEs and OBEs for dental students to reduce test anxiety and enhance academic performance.
Methods: Using a quasi-experimental research method, a blended assessment that combined CBEs in class and OBEs online was designed for a dental course. In 2020, when the pandemic was at its peak, student assessment was ineffective, and the 2020 cohort was omitted for our study; instead, two cohorts of predoctoral dental students (N = 178) enrolled in Restorative Dentistry in the spring semesters of 2019 and 2021 were included in the study. These students were informed about the experimental design, and they provided written consent for data collection, thereby voluntarily participating in the survey. Their self-perceived responses to open-ended survey questions on assessment methods were qualitatively analyzed.
Results: There was no significant difference in test anxiety between the CBEs and OBEs at the p-values of 0.001 in all items. Traditional and blended assessment showed a similar trend of lower scores in midterm exams compared to higher scores in final exams, thus discriminating against students' performances. In particular, a low-achieving group was better predicted by a blended assessment. An analysis of the students' self-perceived responses produced highly topical themes, including exam burden, learning effects, and fairness issues.
Conclusions: This study confirmed the feasibility of blended assessment that can be implemented in online and in-person educational environments. Moreover, it can be used as the groundwork to develop new models of assessment in dental education.
Keywords: Academic performance; Blended assessment; Closed-book exams; Open-book exams; Test anxiety.
© 2023. The Author(s).
Similar articles
-
Impact of Blended Learning on Dental Students' Performance and Satisfaction in Clinical Education.J Dent Educ. 2020 Feb;84(2):135-142. doi: 10.21815/JDE.019.167. J Dent Educ. 2020. PMID: 32043588
-
Effect of Changing From Closed-Book to Formulary-Allowed Examinations.Am J Pharm Educ. 2021 Jan;85(1):7990. doi: 10.5688/ajpe7990. Epub 2020 Oct 2. Am J Pharm Educ. 2021. PMID: 34281816 Free PMC article.
-
Does a sudden shift of testing format from closed-book to open-book change the characteristics of test scores on summative final exams?Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021 Sep;13(9):1174-1179. doi: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.039. Epub 2021 Jun 21. Curr Pharm Teach Learn. 2021. PMID: 34330396 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing Open-Book and Closed-Book Examinations: A Systematic Review.Acad Med. 2016 Apr;91(4):583-99. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000977. Acad Med. 2016. PMID: 26535862 Review.
-
A statistical analysis of dental hygiene students' grades in online and on-campus courses and performance on the National Board Dental Hygiene Exams.J Dent Hyg. 2002 Summer;76(3):213-7. J Dent Hyg. 2002. PMID: 12271867 Review.
References
-
- Beth J, Amber D, Jill M. A systematic review comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: evaluating effects on development of critical thinking skills. Nurse Educ Pract. 2017;27:89–94. - DOI
-
- Durning SJ, Dong T, Ratcliffe T, Schuwirth L, Artino AR, Boulet JR, Eva K. Comparing open-book and closed-book examinations: a systematic review. Acad Med. 2016;91:583–99. - DOI
-
- Dave M, Ariyaratnam S, Dixon C, Patel N. Open-book examinations. Br Dent J. 2020;229(3):149–149. - DOI
-
- Flinders DJ, Anderson LW, Sosniak LA. Bloom’s taxonomy: a forty-year retrospective. Hist Educ Q. 1996;36(1):76–8. - DOI
-
- Ng CKC. Evaluation of academic integrity of online open book assessments implemented in an undergraduate medical radiation science course during COVID-19 pandemic. J Med Imaging Radiat Sci. 2020;51(4):610–6. - DOI