Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Young Woman with Diabetes and Hypertension after mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination—A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature
1
Department of Ophthalmology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
2
School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung 807, Taiwan
3
Department of Ophthalmology, Edward S. Harkness Eye Institute, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, NY 10032, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Vaccines 2023, 11(2), 365; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020365
Submission received: 6 December 2022
/
Revised: 30 January 2023
/
Accepted: 31 January 2023
/
Published: 5 February 2023
Abstract
:A 25-year-old female with diabetes and hypertension presented with progressive painless blurred vision in her left eye ten days after she received her third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). The clinical examination confirmed the diagnosis of Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CRVO) complicated with macular edema. Three doses of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were injected intravitreally. Visual acuity was improved from 20/100 to 20/30, but recurrence was noted at 6 months. Several cases of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported. However, the present case is the youngest female individual documented to have CRVO after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This case demonstrates that the macular edema might be recurrent in patients with risk factors for CRVO who receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, suggesting the need for careful consideration of the treatment strategy and close follow-up. Although the definite pathogenesis still needs to be carefully determined, this report highlights the possible association between RVO and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccination, even in young individuals.
1. Introduction
Given the threat of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection worldwide, there has been vigorous research for effective treatment strategies and vaccine development to contain the pandemic. Vaccines help protect against certain diseases by providing individual and herd immunity, serving an important role in global public health. The four categories of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines include mRNA vaccines, which deliver genetic code through lipid nanoparticles (e.g., BNT162b2, Pfizer-BioN-Tech [1], mRNA-1273 and Moderna [2]), protein subunit vaccines, which extract short fragments of proteins from inactivated disease-causing microorganisms (e.g., NVX-CoV2373, Novavax [3]), vector vaccines, which use viral carriers to deliver DNA signal sequences of spike proteins (e.g., Ad26COVS1, Janssen Johnson & Johnson [4], AZD1222 and Oxford-AstraZeneca [5]) and whole virus vaccines (e.g., PiCoVacc, Sinovac, BBIBP-CorV and Sinopharm). Eleven vaccines were granted emergency use listing (EUL) by the World Health Organization (WHO) [6]. Out of these eleven vaccines, Pfizer-BioN-Tech, Moderna, Oxford-AstraZeneca and Janssen Johnson & Johnson were approved by most countries worldwide and thus are more commonly used.
The reported side effects of COVID-19 vaccination include thrombosis with thrombocytopenia, Guillain–Barre syndrome and myocarditis. In addition, several ocular adverse effects after COVID-19 vaccination have been reported [7]. Here, we present the case of a 25-year-old woman who developed central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) after BNT162b2 administration. We also describe retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after COVID-19 vaccination and outline key steps for providers to take to monitor patients after vaccination. To date, this report details the youngest female patient who developed CRVO after receiving BNT162b2.
2. Case Report
A 25-year-old obese female with a history of hypertension managed by regular oral medications presented with progressive, painless blurred vision in her left eye for several days. Ten days before symptom onset, she received her third dose of the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech). She did not have a history of taking oral contraceptive pills or a history of smoking. She had no history of allergies. At presentation, the best corrected visual acuity was 20/100 in the left eye and 20/20 in the right eye. Intraocular pressure was 13 mmHg in the right eye and 18 mmHg in the left eye. No relative afferent pupil defect was found. Slit lamp anterior segment examination showed no abnormal findings. In the left eye, fundus examination revealed a diffuse flame shape hemorrhage, disc edema and severe macula edema (Figure 1A,B). Fluorescein angiography (FA) disclosed delayed arterial phase and arteriovenous transit time without significant ischemic areas in the retina (Figure 2). Auto-perimetry showed paracentral scotoma (Figure 3). Spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) revealed severe subfoveal fluid accumulation. A thorough survey of laboratory examinations was completed (Table 1). Aside from an incident finding of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus (HbA1c: 9.2%), lab data associated with hyperlipidemia and hypercoagulopathy were within normal limits. Carotid ultrasound imaging revealed normal findings. Due to severe macular edema, she received an intravitreal injection of ranibizumab (IVR). Three weeks later, there was sustained subfoveal fluid, although the total amount of fluid had decreased from the first visit (Figure 1C). The patient was given intravitreal injections of aflibercept (IVA) four weeks after receiving the IVR. Six weeks after initial presentation, the macular edema completely subsided. SD-OCT showed decreased central macular thickness (Figure 1E) and her best corrected visual acuity was improved to 20/40. However, progressive retinal hemorrhage was noted 12 weeks after diagnosis of the disease (Figure 1H). She then received a second dose of IVA. The visual acuity further improved to 20/32 shortly after injection. Six months after the diagnosis, SD-OCT revealed recurrent macular edema (Figure 1I), and a third dose of IVA was then administered. Macular edema was completely absent and no new retinal hemorrhage was found at her last visit (7 months after diagnosis) (Figure 1K,L).
3. Discussion
Although rare, several ocular manifestations after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination have been documented. Graves’ disease activation, corneal graft rejection, herpes zoster ophthalmicus (HZO), uveitis, Vogt–Koyanagi–Harada (VKH) disease, acute abducens nerve palsy, Bell’s palsy, arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy, central serous chorioretinopathy, RVO and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis have been observed in patients who received the Pfizer-BioN-Tech vaccine [7,8,9,10]. Bilateral immune-mediated keratolysis, corneal graft rejection, VKH disease, multifocal choroiditis, acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN), optic neuritis, superior ophthalmic vein thrombosis and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis have been associated with the Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine [7,8,9,10]. No causal relationships between vaccinations and the diseases mentioned above have been established to date. With the growing number of documented complications after vaccination and the potential ocular adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, physicians should carefully follow patients after vaccination.
Retinal vein occlusion, commonly seen in the ophthalmologic clinical practice, is the second leading cause of retinal vascular blindness after diabetic retinopathy. It is classified into branch RVO (BRVO), hemiretinal vein occlusion (HRVO) and CRVO based on the location of the obstruction. The typical fundus findings associated with CRVO include tortuosity and dilatation of all branches of the central retinal vein, dot/blot and flame-shaped hemorrhages, optic disc and macula edema and cotton-wool spots. CRVO is further categorized into the ischemic and non-ischemic types based on the perfusion status. Ischemic CRVO tends to present with poor visual acuity, the presence of relative afferent pupillary defects, non-perfusion of more than 10 disc areas on FA and a higher probability of negative ERG patterns. Venous compression at arteriovenous crossings, degenerative venous change including venous stasis and endothelial damage along with hypercoagulable states may be involved in the pathogenesis. The likelihood of developing RVO increases with age [11]. A total of 90% of cases occur in patients over the age of 55 years. Common atherosclerosis risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia and smoking are commonly reported to be associated with RVO. Less commonly, blood coagulation disorders and systemic inflammatory disorders are also risk factors of RVO [12,13]. According to The Beaver Dam Eye Study, a population-based study, the prevalence of CRVO and BRVO were 0.1% and 0.6%, respectively. The population included indivisuals that were 43 to 84 years of age. The odds ratio of hypertension and diabetes were 5.42 and 2.43 for the incidence of BRVO, respectively [14]. From a review summarizing studies in the Unites States, Europe, Asia and Australia, with 68751 individuals with ages ranging from 30 to 101 years, the prevalence of any RVO, BRVO and CRVO were 0.52%, 0.442% and 0.08%, respectively. Given the extremely low prevalence in young people, data for those under 30 years of age are not available in these reports. In the group aged 30 to 39 years, the prevalence of any RVO, BRVO and CRVO were 0.162%, 0.162% and 0%, respectively [15]. These studies showed that younger individuals, especially those under the age of 30, rarely experience RVO.
A total of 22 papers with 51 cases that present with RVO after COVID-19 vaccination are summarized in Table 2. Some cases had risk factors of hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia, but some cases did not describe in detail the concomitants of other systemic diseases. There were 21 cases of CRVO (Table 3). Of the 21 cases, 1 of them included findings of central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO), 1 included findings of CRAO and ischemic optic neuropathy and a third included findings of CRAO and exudative retinal detachment. There were 13 males and 8 females, ranging in age from 13 to 96 years old. Nine of them received BNT162b2, nine received AZD1222, and single cases received mRNA-1273, Ad26.COV2 and Corbevax, respectively. Symptoms appeared between 15 min and 28 days after vaccination. There were 26 cases of RVO after BNT162b2 vaccination (Table 4). A total of 9 of them were cases of CRVO, 13 of them were cases of BRVO, 1 of them was a case of HRVO and 5 of them did not specify the RVO type. Male cases were more predominant over female cases in these three groups. In addition, the average age was 57 (ranging from 27 to 96 years old), and the other two groups had an average age of 65 and 79 years old, respectively. Of the 8 cases of CRVO after BNT162b2, only 1 case of a 96-year-old had risk factors of HTN and DM. According to previous reports, the side effects of the vaccine do not necessarily occur after the first dose. A total of 22 of the 51 cases from the published reports presented with RVO after the 2nd dose of the vaccination [16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. There was 1 case which showed symptoms appearing 25 days after receiving the 3rd dose of AZD1222 [29].
Recurrent retinal hemorrhage and macular edema occurred in the present case after three doses of intravitreal injection in a six-month follow-up period while the patient’s systemic diseases were well-managed. Most published cases have relatively short periods of follow-up time and lack presentation of the patients’ final visual acuities. There are three cases of CRVO after BNT162b2 with initial VA of 20/30, 20/40 and 20/40, who had VA of 20/20 after IVI anti-VEGF without detailed follow-up information [16,31,34]. Our case demonstrates that macular edema caused by vaccine-associated CRVO may be recurrent, and may cause poor initial visual acuity.
Based on the Naranjo scoresheet for assessing the treatment-adverse reaction association [38], the subject scored 5 points, indicating a probable association. However, since the complications of CRVO are often irreversible and further serious complications such as neovascular glaucoma may happen, documentation of potential association is important.
The early onset of CRVO at 25 years of age indicates that other mechanisms associated with hypercoagulability and inflammatory processes need to be considered. For this rare ocular complication associated with vaccination, it is difficult to confirm a causal relationship. Findings from previous case reports, and the young age of the patient, allow for the supposition that vaccination may have played a role in CRVO development. Vaccines for COVID-19 were designed to produce high levels of neutralizing antibodies targeting spike proteins and to activate T-helper responses. Several possible mechanisms of adverse reactions to vaccination have been described, including autoimmune/inflammatory syndrome induced by adjuvants (ASIA), altered metabolism of RNA (spike protein) in susceptible individuals, stimulation of innate immunity through nucleic acid receptors (e.g., TLRs), molecular mimicry between vaccine peptide fragments and human-derived proteins and delayed hypersensitivity with deposition of immune complexes [7,8]. When it comes to the thrombotic events associated with BNT162b2 vaccines, vasculitis or hypercoagulable status caused by antigen-specific cell- and antibody-mediated hypersensitivity reactions and molecular mimicry might be the possible mechanism. Moreover, PF4 antibodies, mainly described in thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS), have also been found in the patients receiving BNT162b2 vaccines [39]. In spite of the hypothesis mentioned above, the direct association of COVID-19 vaccination with RVO requires further study to clarify the pathogenesis.
4. Conclusions
To date, the present case is the youngest (25 years old) female individual who presented with CRVO after COVID-19 vaccination. However, definite causality needs to be established carefully. Physicians should closely monitor patients for ocular adverse effects following COVID-19 vaccination, and this report provides information on potential treatments for approaching similar complications. Patients with risk factors for RVO, even those who are young, should be closely followed for complications after vaccination. Overall, the incidence of CRVO following COVID-19 vaccination appears to be low. The benefits of vaccinations still outweigh the potential risks, but patients should receive prompt ocular examination when they notice minor visual impairments after vaccination.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.-K.W. and P.-K.L.; data curation, S.-Y.S. and L.A.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-Y.S.; writing—review and editing, L.A.J., Y.-C.C. and P.-K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
Pei-Kang Liu and his laboratory are supported by the research grant MOST 111-2314-B-037-068, MOST 110-2918-I-037-003, from the National Science and Technology Council, Taiwan and KMUH110-0R50, KMUH109-9R50 from Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board. (KMUHIRB-E(I)-20210129, date of approval: 8 June 2021).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from the subject involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Thomas, S.J.; Moreira, E.D., Jr.; Kitchin, N.; Absalon, J.; Gurtman, A.; Lockhart, S.; Perez, J.L.; Pérez Marc, G.; Polack, F.P.; Zerbini, C.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine through 6 Months. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1761–1773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Baden, L.R.; El Sahly, H.M.; Essink, B.; Kotloff, K.; Frey, S.; Novak, R.; Diemert, D.; Spector, S.A.; Rouphael, N.; Creech, C.B.; et al. Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 384, 403–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heath, P.T.; Galiza, E.P.; Baxter, D.N.; Boffito, M.; Browne, D.; Burns, F.; Chadwick, D.R.; Clark, R.; Cosgrove, C.; Galloway, J.; et al. Safety and Efficacy of NVX-CoV2373 Covid-19 Vaccine. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021, 385, 1172–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Sadoff, J.; Gray, G.; Vandebosch, A.; Cárdenas, V.; Shukarev, G.; Grinsztejn, B.; Goepfert, P.A.; Truyers, C.; Van Dromme, I.; Spiessens, B.; et al. Final Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Single-Dose Ad26.COV2.S. N. Engl. J. Med. 2022, 386, 847–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Voysey, M.; Clemens, S.A.C.; Madhi, S.A.; Weckx, L.Y.; Folegatti, P.M.; Aley, P.K.; Angus, B.; Baillie, V.L.; Barnabas, S.L.; Bhorat, Q.E.; et al. Safety and efficacy of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine (AZD1222) against SARS-CoV-2: An interim analysis of four randomised controlled trials in Brazil, South Africa, and the UK. Lancet 2021, 397, 99–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- World Health Organization. COVID-19 Vaccines with WHO Emergency Use Listing. Available online: https://extranet.who.int/pqweb/vaccines/vaccinescovid-19-vaccine-eul-issued (accessed on 16 July 2022).
- Ng, X.L.; Betzler, B.K.; Ng, S.; Chee, S.P.; Rajamani, L.; Singhal, A.; Rousselot, A.; Pavesio, C.E.; Gupta, V.; de Smet, M.D.; et al. The Eye of the Storm: COVID-19 Vaccination and the Eye. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2022, 11, 81–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, Y.K.; Huang, Y.H. Ocular Manifestations after Receiving COVID-19 Vaccine: A Systematic Review. Vaccines 2021, 9, 1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lin, T.P.H.; Ko, C.N.; Zheng, K.; Lai, K.H.W.; Wong, R.L.M.; Lee, A.; Zhang, S.; Huang, S.S.; Wan, K.H.; Lam, D.S.C. COVID-19: Update on Its Ocular Involvements, and Complications from Its Treatments and Vaccinations. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 10, 521–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ng, X.L.; Betzler, B.K.; Testi, I.; Ho, S.L.; Tien, M.; Ngo, W.K.; Zierhut, M.; Chee, S.P.; Gupta, V.; Pavesio, C.E.; et al. Ocular Adverse Events After COVID-19 Vaccination. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2021, 29, 1216–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Song, P.; Xu, Y.; Zha, M.; Zhang, Y.; Rudan, I. Global epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence, incidence, and risk factors. J. Glob. Health 2019, 9, 010427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ip, M.; Hendrick, A. Retinal Vein Occlusion Review. Asia Pac. J. Ophthalmol. 2018, 7, 40–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ophthalmologists, T.R.C.o. Retinal Vein Occlusion (RVO) Guidelines; The Royal College of Ophthalmologists: London, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Klein, R.; Klein, B.E.; Moss, S.E.; Meuer, S.M. The epidemiology of retinal vein occlusion: The Beaver Dam Eye Study. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 2000, 98, 133–141, discussion 141–133. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Rogers, S.; McIntosh, R.L.; Cheung, N.; Lim, L.; Wang, J.J.; Mitchell, P.; Kowalski, J.W.; Nguyen, H.; Wong, T.Y. The prevalence of retinal vein occlusion: Pooled data from population studies from the United States, Europe, Asia, and Australia. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 313–319.e311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bialasiewicz, A.A.; Farah-Diab, M.S.; Mebarki, H.T. Central retinal vein occlusion occurring immediately after 2nd dose of mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Int. Ophthalmol. 2021, 41, 3889–3892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Priluck, A.Z.; Arevalo, J.F.; Pandit, R.R. Ischemic retinal events after COVID-19 vaccination. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2022, 26, 101540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tanaka, H.; Nagasato, D.; Nakakura, S.; Tanabe, H.; Nagasawa, T.; Wakuda, H.; Imada, Y.; Mitamura, Y.; Tabuchi, H. Exacerbation of branch retinal vein occlusion post SARS-CoV2 vaccination: Case reports. Medicine 2021, 100, e28236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Peters, M.C.; Cheng, S.S.H.; Sharma, A.; Moloney, T.P. Retinal vein occlusion following COVID-19 vaccination. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2022, 50, 459–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sugihara, K.; Kono, M.; Tanito, M. Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion after Messenger RNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccine. Case Rep. Ophthalmol. 2022, 13, 28–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ikegami, Y.; Numaga, J.; Okano, N.; Fukuda, S.; Yamamoto, H.; Terada, Y. Combined central retinal artery and vein occlusion shortly after mRNA-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Qjm 2022, 114, 884–885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sacconi, R.; Simona, F.; Forte, P.; Querques, G. Retinal Vein Occlusion Following Two Doses of mRNA-1237 (Moderna) Immunization for SARS-Cov-2: A Case Report. Ophthalmol. Ther. 2022, 11, 453–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, H.S.; Byun, Y.; Byeon, S.H.; Kim, S.S.; Kim, Y.J.; Lee, C.S. Retinal Hemorrhage after SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination. J. Clin. Med. 2021, 10, 5705. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sonawane, N.J.; Yadav, D.; Kota, A.R.; Singh, H.V. Central retinal vein occlusion post-COVID-19 vaccination. Indian. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 308–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lee, S.; Sankhala, K.K.; Bose, S.; Gallemore, R.P. Combined Central Retinal Artery and Vein Occlusion with Ischemic Optic Neuropathy After COVID-19 Vaccination. Int. Med. Case. Rep. J. 2022, 15, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Romano, D.; Morescalchi, F.; Romano, V.; Semeraro, F. COVID-19 AdenoviralVector Vaccine and Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2022, 30, 1286–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, Y.C. Combined central retinal artery occlusion and vein occlusion with exudative retinal detachment following COVID-19 vaccination. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 2022, 38, 1020–1021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Vujosevic, S.; Limoli, C.; Romano, S.; Vitale, L.; Villani, E.; Nucci, P. Retinal vascular occlusion and SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Graefes Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2022, 260, 3455–3464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dutta Majumder, P.; Prakash, V.J. Retinal venous occlusion following COVID-19 vaccination: Report of a case after third dose and review of the literature. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 2191–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pur, D.R.; Catherine Danielle Bursztyn, L.L.; Iordanous, Y. Branch retinal vein occlusion in a healthy young man following mRNA COVID-19 vaccination. Am. J. Ophthalmol. Case Rep. 2022, 26, 101445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Endo, B.; Bahamon, S.; Martínez-Pulgarín, D.F. Central retinal vein occlusion after mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2021, 69, 2865–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shah, P.P.; Gelnick, S.; Jonisch, J.; Verma, R. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Following BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 Messenger RNA Vaccine. Retin. Cases Brief Rep. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sodhi, P.K.; Yadav, A.; Sharma, B.; Sharma, A.; Kumar, P. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion Following the First Dose of COVID Vaccine. Cureus 2022, 14, e25842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Takacs, A.; Ecsedy, M.; Nagy, Z.Z. Possible COVID-19 MRNA Vaccine-Induced Case of Unilateral Central Retinal Vein Occlusion. Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2022, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Karageorgiou, G.; Chronopoulou, K.; Georgalas, I.; Kandarakis, S.; Tservakis, I.; Petrou, P. Branch retinal vein occlusion following ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (Oxford-AstraZeneca) vaccine. Eur. J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 11206721221124651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nangia, P.; Prakash, V.J.; Dutta Majumder, P. Retinal venous occlusion in a child following Corbevax COVID-19 vaccination. Indian J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 70, 3713–3715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tanaka, H.; Nagasato, D.; Nakakura, S.; Nagasawa, T.; Wakuda, H.; Kurusu, A.; Mitamura, Y.; Tabuchi, H. Branch retinal vein occlusion post severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination. Taiwan J. Ophthalmol. 2022, 12, 202–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cunningham, E.T.; Moorthy, R.S.; Agarwal, M.; Smit, D.P.; Zierhut, M. Ocular Complications Following COVID-19 Vaccination—Coincidence, Correlation, or Causation? Ocul. Immunol. Inflamm. 2022, 30, 1031–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Thiele, T.; Ulm, L.; Holtfreter, S.; Schönborn, L.; Kuhn, S.O.; Scheer, C.; Warkentin, T.E.; Bröker, B.M.; Becker, K.; Aurich, K.; et al. Frequency of positive anti-PF4/polyanion antibody tests after COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 and BNT162b2. Blood 2021, 138, 299–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1.
SD-OCT and color fundus imaging over the 7 months since first presentation. (A,B) Initial presentation of diffuse flame shape hemorrhage, macular edema and disc edema with visual acuity of 20/100 in the left eye. (C,D) Three weeks after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, macular edema decreased. Intravitreal injection of aflibercept was given for incomplete treatment response to ranibizumab. (E,F) Six weeks after the diagnosis, macular edema subsided. (G,H) Three months after the diagnosis, progressive retinal hemorrhage was observed. A second dose of aflibercept was given. (I,J) Six months after the initial diagnosis, recurrent macular edema was observed and the third dose of aflibercept was administered. (K,L) Seven months after the diagnosis, macular edema completely subsided with no retinal hemorrhage observed.
Figure 1.
SD-OCT and color fundus imaging over the 7 months since first presentation. (A,B) Initial presentation of diffuse flame shape hemorrhage, macular edema and disc edema with visual acuity of 20/100 in the left eye. (C,D) Three weeks after intravitreal injection of ranibizumab, macular edema decreased. Intravitreal injection of aflibercept was given for incomplete treatment response to ranibizumab. (E,F) Six weeks after the diagnosis, macular edema subsided. (G,H) Three months after the diagnosis, progressive retinal hemorrhage was observed. A second dose of aflibercept was given. (I,J) Six months after the initial diagnosis, recurrent macular edema was observed and the third dose of aflibercept was administered. (K,L) Seven months after the diagnosis, macular edema completely subsided with no retinal hemorrhage observed.
Figure 2.
Fluorescein angiography (FA) of the left eye showed delayed arterial phase and arteriovenous transit time without significant ischemic areas in the retina.
Figure 2.
Fluorescein angiography (FA) of the left eye showed delayed arterial phase and arteriovenous transit time without significant ischemic areas in the retina.
Figure 3.
Auto-perimetry (Humphrey 30−2) of the left eye. A paracentral scotoma with mean deviation of −4.80 dB was noted on the left eye.
Figure 3.
Auto-perimetry (Humphrey 30−2) of the left eye. A paracentral scotoma with mean deviation of −4.80 dB was noted on the left eye.
Table 1.
Clinical laboratory results of the patient. Except for HbA1c*, other data were negative or within normal limits.
Table 1.
Clinical laboratory results of the patient. Except for HbA1c*, other data were negative or within normal limits.
| Laboratory Test | Results | Laboratory Test | Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| White Blood Cell(/μL) | 8350 | RPR | Non-Reactive |
| Urea N (mg/dL) | 7.6 | ANA | <1.40 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.48 | RA factor (IU/mL) | <10.0 |
| Na (m mol/L) | 134 | PT (second) | 10.5 |
| K (m mol/L) | 3.7 | PTT (second) | 27.1 |
| SGOT (IU/L) | 18 | D-Dimer (mg/L FEU) | 0.19 |
| SGPT (IU/L) | 27 | Protein C (%) | 97 |
| CRP (mg/L) | 1.98 | Protein S (%) | 88 |
| ESR (mm/h) | 9 | Homocysteine (μmol/L) | 6.59 |
| *HbA1c (%) | 9.2 | Anti-cardiolipin antibody | negative |
| Cholesterol (mg/dL) | 148 | Anti-β2 glycoprotein-I antibody | negative |
| TG (mg/dL) | 8 | LAC (lupus anticoagulant) (ratio) | <1.2 |
Table 2.
Summary of studies that describe retinal vein occlusion (RVO) after COVID-19 vaccination.
| Study | Case | Vaccine | First Onset (day) | Age | Sex | Risk Factors | Diagnosis | Management | Visual Acuity (Initial→Final) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Priluck et al. (Apr. 22) [17] | 1 | 2nd mRNA-1273 | - | 57 | F | HTN | BRVO | Aflibercept monthly for 6 months | 20/30->20/25 |
| Tanaka et al. (Nov. 21) [18] | 2 | 2nd BNT162b2 | 1 R | 71 | F | History of BRVO | BRVO | Aflibercept*1 | 20/30->20/20 |
| 1st BNT162b2 | 1 R | 72 | M | History of BRVO | BRVO | Ranibizumab*2 | 20/25->20/25 | ||
| Peters et al. (Jan. 22) [19] | 5 | 1st AZD1222 | 2 | 71 | M | Unremarkable | BRVO | Bevacizumab (monthly) | 6/60 |
| 1st AZD1222 | 3 | 58 | M | Unremarkable | HRVO | Bevacizumab (monthly) | 6/18 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 3 | 73 | F | HTN | BRVO | Aflibercept (monthly) | 6/19 | ||
| 1st BNT162b2 | 5 | 47 | F | Unremarkable | BRVO | Bevacizumab (monthly) | 6/9.6 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 1–3 | 36 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Aflibercept (monthly) | 6/9 | ||
| Sugihara et al. (Jan. 22) [20] | 1 | 2nd BNT162b2 | 11 L | 38 | M | Unremarkable | BRVO | Aflibercept*2 | 0.9->1.2 |
| Pur et al. (Feb. 22) [30] | 1 | 1st BNT162b2 | 2 R | 34 | M | Unremarkable | BRVO | None | 20/20 |
| Endo et al. (Sep. 21) [31] | 1 | 1st BNT162b2 | 15 L | 52 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Steroid*1 Bevacizumab*1 | 20/30->20/20 |
| Ikegami et al.(Nov. 2021) [21] | 1 | 2nd mRNA-1273 | 2 R | 54 | F | Unremarkable | CRVO + CRAO | None | NLP |
| Sacconi et al. (Dec. 2021) [22] | 1 | 2nd mRNA-1273 | 2 R | 74 | F | Unremarkable | HRVO | Ranibizumab*2 | 20/40->20/32 |
| Bialasiewicz et al. (Aug. 2021) [16] | 1 | 2nd BNT162b2 | 15 min L | 50 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Aflibercept | 0.5->1.0 |
| Park et al. (Dec. 2021) [23] | 11 | 1st AZD1222 | 1 L | 68 | F | Hyperlipidemia | RVO | None | HM |
| 1st BNT162b2 | 2 L | 76 | M | HTN | BRVO | None | 0.8 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 1 R | 85 | F | DM, HTN | RVO | Bevacizumab | CF10 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 2 L | 59 | M | DM, HTN | RVO | None | 0.8 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 2 R | 61 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Bevacizumab | 0.04 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 2 L | 79 | M | DM | RVO | Bevacizumab | 0.04 | ||
| 1st BNT162b2 | 16 L | 77 | F | HTN | BRVO | Bevacizumab | 0.8 | ||
| 1st BNT162b2 | 13 R | 63 | M | DM | RVO | Bevacizumab | 0.01 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 21 L | 51 | F | HTN | BRVO | Bevacizumab | 0.09 | ||
| 1st BNT162b2 | 4 L | 81 | F | HTN | RVO | None | 0.3 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 3 L | 61 | M | HTN | CRVO | None | 0.9 | ||
| Sonawane et al. (Dec. 2021) [24] | 2 | 2nd AZD1222 | 4 R | 50 | M | DM | CRVO | Anti-VEGF | 6/60 |
| 2nd AZD1222 | 3 R | 43 | F | Unremarkable | CRVO | None | 5/60 | ||
| Shah et al. (Dec. 2021) [32] | 1 | 1st BNT162b2 Worsen after 2nd | Few days | 27 | F | Unremarkable | CRVO | Ranibizumab | improved |
| Lee et al. (Jan. 2022) [25] | 1 | 2nd BNT162b2 | 10–12 L | 34 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO + CRAO + ischemic optic neuropathy | Aflibercept anti-inflammatories, diuretics, anti- platelet agents and anticoagulant | CF->20/30 |
| Sodhi et al. (June 2022) [33] | 1 | 1st AZD1222 | 3 L | 43 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Triamcinolone *1 | 20/630->20/200 |
| Romano et al. (July 2022) [26] | 1 | 2nd AZD1222 | 2 R | 54 | F | HTN | CRVO | Dexamethasone implant + PRP | 20/400 ->20/200 |
| Takacs et al. (Aug 2022) [34] | 1 | 1st BNT162b2 | 14 R | 35 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | Aflibercept Oral aspirin | 0.5 ->1.0 |
| Karageorgiou et al. (Sep 2022) [35] | 1 | AZD1222 | 7 R | 60 | M | Unremarkable | BRVO | Anti-VEGF | - |
| Nangia et al. (Sep 2022) [36] | 1 | 1st Corbevax | 28 L | 13 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | IVMP 0.5 g for 3 days followed by oral steroid | 6/7.5->6/6 |
| Majumder et al. (May 2022) [29] | 1 | 3rd AZD1222 | 25 R | 28 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | IVMP 1 g for 3 days followed by oral steroid | 2/60->6/9 |
| Chen et al. (July 2022) [27] | 1 | 2nd BNT162b2 | 10 R | 72 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO + CRAO + exudative RD | Aflibercept IVMP 1 g for 3 days followed by oral steroid PRP | HM->20/400 |
| Vujosevic et al. (May 2022) [28] | 13 | 1st AZD1222 | 7 R | 69 | F | (Deep venous thrombosis) | BRVO | Laser photocoagulation | 20/32->20/20 |
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 14 R | 82 | F | Unremarkable | BRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/63->20/40 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 7 R | 96 | F | HTN, DM | CRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/200->20/200 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 10 L | 91 | F | Unremarkable | CRVO | None | CF | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 7 both | 78 | F | Unremarkable | BRVO | Anti-VEGF, R | 20/25->20/20(R) 20/20(L) | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 7 R | 70 | M | Unremarkable | CRVO | None | 20/20 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 14 R | 40 | M | Hyperhomocysteinemia | BRVO | None | 20/20 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 28 R | 91 | M | DM | BRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/32->20/32 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 21 R | 72 | F | HTN hyperlipidemia | BRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/25->20/20 | ||
| 2nd BNT162b2 | 14 R | 88 | M | HTN, hyperlipidema | HRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/125->20/125 | ||
| 2nd AZD1222 | 28 R | 73 | F | HTN, hyperlipidemia | CRVO | Steroid treatment | CF->CF | ||
| 1st Ad26. COV2 | 7 R | 65 | F | HTN, hyperlipidemia, DM | CRVO | Steroid treatment | 20/40->20/32 | ||
| 1st AZD1222 | 14 L | 72 | F | HTN | HRVO | Laser photocoagulation | 20/50->20/50 | ||
| Tanaka et al. (May 2022) [37] | 2 | 1st BNT162b2 | 3 R | 50 | F | Unremarkable | BRVO | Ranibizumab*3 | 20/25->20/20 |
| 1st BNT162b2 | 3 R | 56 | F | Unremarkable | BRVO | Ranibizumab*3 | 13/20->20/20 |
Abbreviations: HTN: hypertension, F: female, M: male, R: right eye, L: left eye, both: both eyes, BRVO: branch retinal vein occlusion, CRVO: central retinal vein occlusion, CRAO: central retinal artery occlusion, HRVO: hemi retinal vein occlusion, NLP: no light perception, HM: hand motion, CF: counting finger, DM: diabetes mellitus, Anti-VEGF: anti-vascular endothelial growth factor, PRP: panretinal photocoagulation, IVMP: intravenous methylprednisolone.
Table 3.
Twenty-one cases of published central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) after COVID-19 vaccination.
Table 3.
Twenty-one cases of published central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO) after COVID-19 vaccination.
| Diagnosis | CRVO: 18 CRVO + CRAO: 1(mRNA-1273) CRVO + CRAO + ischemic ON: 1(BNT162b2) CRVO + CRAO + exudative RD: 1 (BNT162b2) |
| Sex | Male: 13 Female: 8 |
| Age | 13–96 |
| Vaccine | BNT162b2: 9 AZD1222: 9 mRNA-1273: 1 Ad26. COV2: 1 Corbevax: 1 |
| Onset after vaccination | 15 min to 28 days |
| Risk factors | HTN: 5 DM: 3 Hyperlipidemia: 1 |
| Treatment | IVI anti-VEGF (Aflibercept, Ranibizumab, Bevacizumab) and steroid, IVMP, laser photocoagulation |
Table 4.
Twenty-six cases of RVO after BNT162b2 vaccination.
| CRVO | BRVO | RVO | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cases | 8 | 13 | 5 |
| Sex (Male/Female) | 5/3 | 7/6 | 3/2 |
| Age | 27–96(Average: 57) | 34–91(Average: 65) | 63–88(Average: 79) |
| Risk factors | 1 96 y/o patient and HTN and DM | HTN: 6 DM: 1 (deep vein thrombosis): 1 Hyperlipidemia: 1 Hyperhomocysteinemia: 1 | DM:4 HTN:5 Hyperlipidemia: 2 |
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content. |
© 2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Sung, S.-Y.; Jenny, L.A.; Chang, Y.-C.; Wang, N.-K.; Liu, P.-K. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Young Woman with Diabetes and Hypertension after mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination—A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature. Vaccines 2023, 11, 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020365
AMA Style
Sung S-Y, Jenny LA, Chang Y-C, Wang N-K, Liu P-K. Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Young Woman with Diabetes and Hypertension after mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination—A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature. Vaccines. 2023; 11(2):365. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020365
Chicago/Turabian StyleSung, Shao-Yu, Laura A. Jenny, Yo-Chen Chang, Nan-Kai Wang, and Pei-Kang Liu. 2023. "Central Retinal Vein Occlusion in a Young Woman with Diabetes and Hypertension after mRNA-Based COVID-19 Vaccination—A Case Report and Brief Review of the Literature" Vaccines 11, no. 2: 365. https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11020365
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
